Questions Raised Over Robot Dog Demo at AI Summit; Galgotias University Asked to Vacate Stall at Bharat Mandapam
New Delhi: A controversy erupted during the AI Impact Summit after a robot dog showcased by Galgotias University drew scrutiny, following which the institution was asked to vacate its stall at the expo area of Bharat Mandapam.
According to information, questions were raised about whether the robot presented at the event had been developed by the university or was a commercially available product. The issue triggered intense discussions among technical experts and participants, prompting organisers to seek clarification.
Sources said objections were raised after the robot dog was projected as an advanced AI innovation. Critics argued that such devices are available in the international market and presenting them as a research achievement could be misleading. The university, however, maintained that the robot was displayed to inspire students rather than to claim it as an in-house development.
Experts noted that robot dogs are considered among the early and basic examples of AI robotics, while the global industry has already progressed to autonomous driving systems, decision-making machines and advanced generative AI. Presenting such products as major breakthroughs, they said, may not accurately reflect current technological progress.
Some observers also pointed out that institutions sometimes purchase ready-made devices and showcase them as innovations, which may create confusion among the public about actual technological capability. Similar demonstrations in the past, they added, were also portrayed as major AI achievements during official events.
The incident has reignited debate over transparency and authenticity in technology exhibitions, with experts stressing that platforms should highlight genuine research and indigenous innovation.
Responding to reports about the stall removal, Professor Neha Singh of Galgotias University said the controversy arose due to lack of clear communication. She stated that the intent was misunderstood and acknowledged she may not have explained the demonstration properly due to the speed and enthusiasm of preparations.
Clarifying further, she said the university never claimed to have manufactured the robot dog and that it was introduced only to motivate students to build better systems themselves. On whether the government ordered the stall to be vacated, she said she had no information and only knew that the team was present at the venue.
Technology observers believe the episode could lead to broader discussions about distinguishing demonstration from innovation and the need for clearer disclosures at future AI exhibitions.