Shah Rukh Khan’s Bungalow ‘Mannat’ Caught in Legal Dispute Before Renovation, Hearing on April 23
Mumbai: Shah Rukh Khan had planned to renovate his iconic Bandra bungalow, ‘Mannat’, but before any changes could begin, a legal hurdle has emerged. A Mumbai-based social activist, Santosh Daundkar, has filed allegations against the actor, leading to a controversy that has stalled the renovation. The case will be heard by the Maharashtra Coastal Zone Management Authority (MCZMA) on April 23.
According to reports, Santosh Daundkar has filed a petition against Shah Rukh Khan with the National Green Tribunal (NGT), accusing both the actor and MCZMA of violating Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) rules by making alterations to ‘Mannat’ without proper authorization. Daundkar claims that renovation work was carried out without obtaining the necessary permissions, thereby violating environmental and heritage conservation norms.
A Landmark Bungalow Now in Legal Trouble
Located in Bandra’s posh neighborhood, Mannat is more than just a home; it is a tourist attraction. Fans from all over the country visit to catch a glimpse of the iconic mansion and take pictures outside its grand gates. Shah Rukh and Gauri Khan had planned to make their dream home even more luxurious, but now it finds itself entangled in legal troubles. The estimated value of ‘Mannat’ is around ₹200 crore, highlighting the superstar’s massive influence and star power.
Interestingly, ‘Mannat’ is classified as a Grade III heritage structure, meaning any modifications require special permissions. The allegations claim that 12 one-BHK apartments, originally meant for public housing, were converted into a single large residence, violating regulations. In response, the NGT has asked activist Santosh Daundkar to present evidence supporting his claims.
Next Hearing on April 23
Judicial member Dinesh Kumar Singh and expert member Vijay Kulkarni have stated that if Shah Rukh Khan or the MCZMA are found guilty of regulatory violations, Daundkar must submit proof within four weeks. If he fails to do so, his appeal may be dismissed. The next hearing is scheduled for April 23.
